Remove Ads

Poll: Would you like to see the Concorde added to the game?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
80.00%
4 80.00%
No
20.00%
1 20.00%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Concordes
#1
As the fastest plane in world history, I think that the Concorde should be added to the game, without restrictions (well...maybe some involving the runway length.)

Would any of you like to see the Concorde added to the game?
Reply
#2
Perhaps in the Interstellar World. The concordes can transport people from New York to Houston, and the concorde can only land in space-ports. Just as a transport for Major City-Space Port City.
[Image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en...r_logo.png]
[b]FlyHigh Forum/Project Manager[/b]
Reply
#3
Actually, I think the Concorde should be able to fly to any airport that has a runway length exceeding 9,500 feet. If necessary, the number can be changed.
Reply
#4
Hey! Don't forget the TU-144! (Once again the russians beat us at something)

I would love to see the Concorde but I think there should be restrictions like:

-No more than 20 economy seats
-May only fly to/from the top 25 airports
-Double maintenance fees.[hr]and 9500 feet is close to the actual requirement.

| I'm the Lead Core Developer! |


A picture is worth 1000 words. FH is worth 7451 [u]lines[/u]!
Reply
#5
My grandfather was a ground engineer/maintenance worker with British Airways and worked on their Concordes at the end of his career for a good few years. I believe he told me that he had to undertake a lot more advanced training in order to be able to work on Concorde. So maybe you need some sort of improvement where your maintenance team are trained to be able to work on Concorde
[align=center][Image: http://civil-aircraft.tk/t365-a.jpg]

[size=x-large]

[b][color=#1E90FF]Tango[/color][color=#32CD32]3[/color][color=#FF4500]6[/color][color=#FFD700]5[/color][/b] [i][color=#696969]- Zesty Services, 365 Days A Year[/i][/color]

[/size]

[/align]
Reply
#6
Also, are we going to do anything about the fact that only 14 were put into service?
[align=center][Image: http://civil-aircraft.tk/t365-a.jpg]

[size=x-large]

[b][color=#1E90FF]Tango[/color][color=#32CD32]3[/color][color=#FF4500]6[/color][color=#FFD700]5[/color][/b] [i][color=#696969]- Zesty Services, 365 Days A Year[/i][/color]

[/size]

[/align]
Reply
#7
(07-30-201408:27 PM)buxy Wrote: Also, are we going to do anything about the fact that only 14 were put into service?

This!
Reply
#8
So how about this:

Concord:
Base: $---,---,---.--
Addons:
Maintenance Addon: $-,---,---.-- : In order to perform maintenance on this aircraft, you must purchase this addon to provide special training and equipment to your maintenance team.
Colbert Addon: $99,999,999,999.99 + s/h : In order for your aircraft to be Colbert-worthy. Pay to the order of Stephen Colbert.

| I'm the Lead Core Developer! |


A picture is worth 1000 words. FH is worth 7451 [u]lines[/u]!
Reply
#9
(07-30-201408:31 PM)emm1366 Wrote:
(07-30-201408:27 PM)buxy Wrote: Also, are we going to do anything about the fact that only 14 were put into service?

This!

maybe put 30 out for sale but only one goes up for sale every 3 months.

| I'm the Lead Core Developer! |


A picture is worth 1000 words. FH is worth 7451 [u]lines[/u]!
Reply
#10
(07-30-201408:20 PM)dbd Wrote: Hey! Don't forget the TU-144! (Once again the russians beat us at something)

I would love to see the Concorde but I think there should be restrictions like:

-No more than 20 economy seats
-May only fly to/from the top 25 airports
-Double maintenance fees.
Oh..that means I can't fly it to Taipei. :/ Can we fly to any airport that has a long enough runway?
Anyways, I think this should work:
E - 100 B - 20 F - 0
The problem is, the plane is never even close to being full, so I think we'd be fine with this amount of people on board.

ALso, I think we shouldn't have twice the cost of maintenance fees.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: